Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2013, 02:16:59 schrieb Stephen Kelly:
> Brad King wrote:
> > On 10/09/2013 12:21 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> >> One thing that is currently unclear if the "simulated compiler id" stuff
> >> from Brad solves the problem of the Clang plugin running with gcc where
> >> one would get the gcc version as compiler version but the features are
> >> actually depending on the version of the Clang plugin.
> > 
> > After the Clang platform files load the GNU files to get the flags
> > they will have to do their own logic to populate the feature lists.
> > They can pass some indicator variable into the GNU files to block
> > the GNU feature lists.
> 
> The mode of operation of clang under discussion is not a 'normal' mode, but
> a mode in which clang and gcc aare both used, if I understood what Eike told
> me.
> 
> I what is being discussed is either this:
> 
>  http://dragonegg.llvm.org/
> 
> or this:
> 
>  http://llvm.org/releases/2.9/docs/CommandGuide/html/llvmgcc.html
> 
> which I think is deprecated.
> 
> Eike, can you provide (a link to) more information on the problem you
> described to me before?

Brad, this is one of your dashboard machines. I currently can't find the mails 
where we discussed that. Can you please give Steven some information about 
this?

Eike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to