On 10/11/2013 04:03 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote: > Does that mean Lua itself is just off the table for 3.0 or altogether?
It just means we're taking one step at a time. I doubt full Lua integration can be in CMake 3.0 but this syntax change is a necessary prerequisite for clean introduction of any other language embedded inside CMake command invocations. It will allow such code to appear literally in .cmake sources without a layer of CMake language escape sequences on top of it. This will be useful on its own anyway. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
