On 22/11/13 19:03, Brad King wrote: > On 11/22/2013 12:28 PM, David Cole wrote: >> So I would add to the documentation saying that typically, only the >> download and update steps ought to be considered as "independent" step >> targets. > > Would it make sense to only allow it for specific steps, or to disallow > it for specific steps for which it is "known bad"?
I wouldn't allow it only for specific step, because user might want to add some custom step and they could be either "dependent" or "independent". For now I added some documentation and added an AUTHOR_WARNING if used for the steps configure, build, install, or test. >> Also, I would ask Brad if the "-# ::" line you've removed is important >> for the new documentation generation scheme... I would assume so, but I >> do not know enough about how it works yet. > > Actually the topic should be rebased on master to resolve conflicts > with the documentation formatting cleanup I made here: I moved the "::" in the previous line, as Brad did ;) Anyway I rebased the branch on master and solved the conflicts Cheers, Daniele -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
