On 11/26/2013 03:20 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: >> That doesn't matter because IMO the properties are not suitable >> for addition because they step on the toes of internal implementation > > What properties would be needed for the IDEs? > And couldn't we make some properties internal only?
We can't necessarily control IDE object file locations in general. Special handling for PCH by C++-implemented support can work in a generator-specific manner such that we do not need to implement these properties at all. We should avoid exposing controls to internal implementation details whenever possible. They make refactoring in the future much harder. Anyway, I think time in this thread is much better spent on the link Steve sent or a similar approach. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
