> As the person who wrote what Qt ships, I can say that it won't be 'complete' > sooner or later unless someone with enough interest communicates/contributes > what is missing. I don't have the requisite mac experience.
Sure, I believe someone will sooner or later submit patches to Qt. > I also think there might be a generic solution (or partial solution) to > implement in CMake first (an interface for determining the package > dependencies perhaps, etc). CMake has everything necessary there install(...) & fixup_bundle(...). > What makes this a Qt issue instead of a generic issue? $ git show 9b98fd52 install_qt5_plugin writing qt.conf and launching fixup_bundle should be part of Qt5 CMake support not part of app specific CMakeLists.txt (in this case CMake.app), e.g. single function install_qt5_bundle that does it all, selects default platform plugins and it is clearly documented somewhere. Also on Qt SDK side there are couple of things to be done: QTBUG-14150 QTBUG-31814 --Adam -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
