On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:59:09 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Trying to bring a bit more attention to this: > > Fedora is pushing to have higher resolution icons for the applications. There > already is CMakeSetup128.png, but these would need to get installed into the > proper /usr/share/icons/ hierarchy and named appropriately for the correct > size to be automatically found and used. It would be good to have cmake-gui be > conformant to the current desktop standards. > > Related - > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13504 > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14315 > > Also might want to consider shipping AppData information. > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/
I think there's a bug about this too (or at least for appdata). My question is: does it really make sense to have appdata for CMake's GUI? It isn't an "end user" application and I feel that developers "know" about CMake's Qt UI (or at least wouldn't look for it in the application tool thing). (I'm not against AppData overall; just wondering whether it makes sense for development tools such as cmake-gui.) Others' thoughts? --Ben -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
