On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 21:02:35 +0000, Fraser Hutchison wrote: > Yeah - no worries. I understand my previous mistake and what's in the > patch should now be OK I think. However, I'm more than happy if you > want to fix this another way and reject the patch - but it'd be good to > nail this before v3.1 is released since it's pretty trivial.
Yep, it looks sane to me (100% untested from my side though). --Ben -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
