On 01/21/2015 12:01 PM, Raffi Enficiaud wrote: > Ok. What do you think about mimicking the mex compiler in terms > of options set to the compiler? The -Wl,--exclude-libs,ALL is in > fact set by the mex compiler for compiling the mex extensions under > Linux. Then I will just drop the REDUCE_VISIBILITY from the > interface and add some doc about the "best practices" that work better.
I think suggesting it in the documentation is fine. If some common cross-platform solutions evolve then we can revisit adding official support. > But I have a quick question about the proper way of adding a test: [snip] > should fail because of a component lacking the the find_package option The best place to put tests covering bad CMake code and error cases is under the Tests/RunCMake infrastructure. That allows explicit matching of return codes and error messages. Thanks, -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
