I favor documenting the existing format, too. Note added to issue with my vote.
D On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Stephen Kelly <steve...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anton Makeev wrote: > >> Not only do we reed it, we also have the UI that allows user to interact >> and the cached values. That means we’ll have CMakeCache parser anyways >> and do not need these values in metadata.json file, as it was mentioned in >> parallel discussion. > > Yes, that's what I thought. I favor documenting the existing format instead > of adding a new json format for it. I filed > > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15490 > > to track the idea. > > Thanks, > > Steve. > > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more > information on each offering, please visit: > > CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html > CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html > CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers