On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 23:20:14 Milian Wolff wrote: > On Montag, 11. Januar 2016 23:22:23 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: ... > > Stephens big approach will need some time until it is ready, while such a > > (relatively) simple thing can probably be done within one release cycle > > (but I don't have the time to do it). > > > > I don't know what the others here think about adding your json-approach or > > not. > > I don't think I'll have the required time to help here either, but I agree > with your reasoning: Your patch is the potentially quickest to get something > done. But it only fixes the usability issue of generators, it does not come > with a useable generator which we'll still need to write.
I thought Aleix's patch was already quite good ? Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
