On 15-Mar-16 02:42, Tamás Kenéz wrote:
I also doubt this belongs to upstream. But you could write a single, generic script which forwards its arguments to cmake and also accepts and processes the additional parameters along the way. I don't think we'd lose anything:

    cmakeini -c ipad -H. -DTHIS_WILL_BE_FORWARDED=AS_IT_IS

This is the approach I took as I needed features like you described. But if there would be a mature, versatile, community-tested script I'd be willing to use it and contribute to it.
As you can see I'm already using script `build.py` and there is not enough power for now (even if it extends CMake basic functionality a lot) so I was thinking to introduce global/local ini-configuration file anyway. Then I realize that most of the `build.py` functions can be implemented in such ini-configuration. So why not use CMake? Why for example not extend CMake GUI with this feature support? Why do users need to install some extra tools instead of just one?

Global/local configuration files in not something special. Git for example has same system, yes it increase complexity but literally every user store setting there.
Just imagine you have to write something like this every commit + push:

> git commit --author="John Doe" --email="john....@example.com" --branch="master"
> git push --remote="git://awesome.example.com"

This is a complete nonsense!

So I'm planning to make a fork anyway and do some experiments even if it will not accepted to upstream.

Ruslo


Tamas

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Ruslan Baratov via cmake-developers <cmake-developers@cmake.org <mailto:cmake-developers@cmake.org>> wrote:

    On 14-Mar-16 21:59, Brad King wrote:

        On 03/12/2016 08:04 AM, Ruslan Baratov via cmake-developers wrote:

            I guess it is a well known fact that cmake command is
            almost never
            executed alone and for non-trivial examples usually hold
            some extra
            arguments (home directory, build directory, verbosity
            level, toolchains,
            options, ...). Also I guess that such commands doesn't
            change from
            day-to-day development process and an obvious way to
            reduce typing is to
            create wrapper build scripts (.bat or .sh, I personally
            use a Python one).

        Sorry, I don't think something like this belongs upstream.  It
        can easily
        be done with shell aliases or other custom scripts.

    I've got quite opposite experience. It's hard to say that family
of custom scripts (+ a lot of environment variables in .bashrc) is an "easy shell scripting", example:
    *
    
https://github.com/ruslo/polly/blob/162cd157d1d05261a7a708435197d883c4209005/bin/build.py

         We shouldn't increase the complexity of the CMake command
        line interface further.

    To be clear this feature required only one new CMake option. The
    rest is responsibility of some pre-build parsing module.

    In general I feel sad that CMake will not became more
    user-friendly in this exact part. Though the only proves of my
    point that can be provided here is a users experience. Since I
    don't see any feedback here I'm out of arguments...

    Ruslo

--
    Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>

    Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
    http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

    Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community.
    For more information on each offering, please visit:

    CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
    CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
    CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

    Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
    http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

    Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
    http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers



-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to