On 06/03/2016 02:05 AM, Yordanov, Dimitar wrote: >> Are you running inside some kind of virtualization or emulation >> environment? > > Actually not. The server is maybe under heavy load, but should it > matter?
See discussion here: https://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15873 > Possibly I'm on the wrong track, but couldn't the compiler reorder the > code where kwsysProcess is set, and move it out of the blocked > section? Should it be volatile to avoid such scenario? I think further investigation/debugging would be needed to answer that. > I thought (void)write(...); is a portable way to say that we are not > interested in the return value. Not that I would change running code > for that. I think we used to have that and some compilers warned anyway. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
