On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 16:46:48 -0400, Brad King wrote: > On 06/23/2016 08:27 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > * Some names could be improved. Suggestions welcome. > > We'll cover these in more detail during review. The most important name is > the name of the feature, and IMO "daemon" is not an accurate description of > it (it is never re-parented to 'init' and has a lifetime tied to the client). > I think "server" would be better but am open to other suggestions. Even if > it later really becomes a daemon the name "server" will still be appropriate. > > As you said before there has been a lot of PR with the name "daemon", but I > don't think it is too late to change it. Those interested in the features > will see the new name when it appears in release notes and should easily be > able to recognize it.
cmake-oracle sounds reasonable for what it's doing to me. --Ben -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
