On 10/06/2015 11:30 AM, Brad King wrote: > On 10/04/2015 10:49 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> I wonder if you plan do resolve this part in the coming cycle? I think >> resolving that part would help me to understand the rest of your proposal in >> the thread. > > I don't know if/when I'll ever have time to return to that work :(
I've continued it here: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/236 I realized that the confusion over interface library configuration selection was due to me having mis-read the original code. Part of the previous iteration of these changes was wrong along with the last paragraph of the commit message about adding support for `MAP_IMPORTED_CONFIG_<CONFIG>` to interface libraries. In fact they already supported it. I have a new version of the changes that is now only about selecting the proper `IMPORTED_LIBNAME` for the current configuration. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
