On 27/11/2018 11:36, Ray Donnelly wrote:
Cmake is defacto, but very suboptional.
(I suppose you meant suboptimal).
well yes, that's why people like Eike are trying to do stuff to improve it.
QBS is also fairly suboptimal in my opinion even if the language is
cleaner - had my share of bugs (sometimes meaning that I couldn't run a
build at all) with some projects using it (namely OpenFrameworks) and
ended up using CMake ports which were much more reliable.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
