On 3/21/19 2:19 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> Can any CMake developer that has been participating in this new
> file api shed some light on the rational of this foreseen switch?
> I'm just curious about it. What was wrong/problematic with server mode?
> Does the new file api solves some IDE integration issue?

The file-api approach does not require a long-running CMake server
process and the associated memory consumption.  It also offers a better
story for format evolution (versioned queries, versioned replies).

The main improvement in the reported codemodel is the availability
of backtraces.

The tracking issue is here:

* https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/18398

Issues that led to it include:

* https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/17753
* https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/17539

-Brad
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to