On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 13:39 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > To my mind those additional endelseif statements in this alternative > proposal go against the whole reason for my first proposal which is to > reduce the clutter that occurs in the equivalent existing form now present > in the language. Also, demanding those extra endelseif statements will > confuse lots of programmers who are used to something very close to my > original proposal for all other languages. So my order of preference is (1) > my original proposal, (2) the status quo, and (last) the alternative > proposal you seem to be advocating. > > What do others here think? If after discussion there is strong support for > my proposal (or any other that reduces clutter for if blocks in a way that > is as consistent as possible with what other languages do), then I will be > happy to make the appropriate wish-list bug report.
I think your proposal (1) would be useful for me. Regards, Yagisan -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209 Fingerprint E1FD 9D7E 6BB4 1BD4 AEB9 3091 0027 CEFA 4B6E 7209
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
