Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 6/9/07, Joshua Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My only concern is maintaining a fork to do this. I already have a
forked CMake with various fixes to the Visual Studio and Xcode support.
Despite increasing usability in these environments, the interest level
in my patches thus far seems virtually non-existent.
Are you saying that Kitware has said they won't take your patches? Or
that they haven't responded in the timeframe you'd like? Or that
people in general don't seem interested in the issues you've patched?
I'm saying they are probably much more busy than I and don't have time
to sort through every single patch that comes in, especially from CMake
"noobs" like me. I take no offense at that. It's life.
There is even an approved patch in the bug tracker for AUI support in
wxWidgets from January 19 of this year that hasn't been integrated into
CMake. I asked about it recently, but no response was given.
In the end, Kitware needs to do what is best financially for Kitware.
If my patches or other people's patches (approved or otherwise) do not
benefit Kitware, I would fully expect there to be little interest.
I just stated the opinion above based solely on whether my efforts on a
C# patch would benefit anyone else by integration into the master build
of CMake or whether the C# patch would sit in a private forked build of
CMake.
What is Kitware's interest in full Visual Studio C# support in CMake?
My apologies for the misunderstanding.
Josh
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
