On 7/30/07, Andy Dingfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are correct in your thoughts that the individual who writes a cmake > plugin would need to know java. Yes as you point out there is always a > risk that perhaps cmake will not be up to the task of large scale cross > platform development and perhaps the individuals who work to get it > integrated will get annoyed and not support it, but given the size of > the CDT userbase I think there are enough eclipse using c++ users out > there to take the risk. I am not familiar with all the ins and outs of > cmake but I suspect it is up to the task, and any issues would just be > implementation details to work out.
What's a non-trivial Java app that's using a CMake build? Dart2 server perhaps? > My thoughts were that ant was more java centric, whereas cmake is c++ > centric and would be a better fit for the CDT. CMake only has to be elegant enough to address the needs of a CDT implementor. Which might be substantial, actually, I don't know. Eclipse is a big project. Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
