This part of the license would concern me. Are all files of interest, by other authors, guaranteed to be BSD friendly?
4. You may modify and include the part of the software into any other software (possibly commercial). But some files in the distribution are not written by the author, so that they are not under this terms. They are gc.c(partly), utils.c(partly), regex.[ch], st.[ch] and some files under the ./missing directory. See each file for the copying condition. Juan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gonzalo Garramuño Sent: Mon 11/5/2007 4:30 PM To: Brandon Van Every; CMake ML Subject: Re: [CMake] improve the CMake language? Brandon Van Every wrote: > > I didn't realize that Ruby is GPLed. http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt > Oh well, so much for embedding Ruby! It isn't. Where did you get that idea from !? Brandon, you have a tendency to email FUD that is amazing... even when you provide links to text that clearly states exactly the opposite of what you say. Ruby is distributed under a dual LGPL / Ruby License. The Ruby License is a MIT-like license. Some portions of ruby are not under that license (as they were not written by the author), but are either BSD (meaning you need to give proper credit) or public domain. For proper info, refer to "LEGAL" in the ruby distribution. -- Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] AMD4400 - ASUS48N-E GeForce7300GT Kubuntu Edgy _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake