On Dec 28, 2007 1:33 PM, Rodolfo Lima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brandon Van Every escreveu: > > > "Too" cumbersome? Surely you jest. What's a long-winded list of > > patterns in terms of your development time? Two minutes tops? > > Oh well... thanks for teaching me another word: jest, and I'm not being > ironic. > > Back to business... imagine the following use case: a project mixes > headers and source files all inside the same directory, along with other > files. During install, I want to get all headers and copy to > <prefix>/include/mylib. That's it. I think this is a very common > scenario.
Do the REGEX and/or REGEX ... EXCLUDE signatures work? If so, then this is a low priority feature request. A PATTERN spares the programmer from having to learn how regexes work, but specifying these kinds of inclusions and exclusions with regexes is trivial. > > Sure, "it's easier." Sounds like a low priority feature request to > > me. File it in the bug tracker. > > I could implement it if I knew that it would be committed to cvs, that's > why I posted the idea here first. Can't imagine why it wouldn't be. You say it's easy to implement, and it's not controversial. > Happy new year, Indeed! Same. Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake