http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as you can get past Linus' personality. Mike On Jan 4, 2008 4:11 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > > However, I admit to having no development experience with git or Mercurial. > > Is there anything compelling (e.g., fewer bugs, better documentation, more > > useful features aside from distributed?) about either over svn for > > projects like CMake that use a centralized repo? > > A significant difference is completely offline operation. With a > centralised tool, by definition you can't commit if you're not on the > network. With a distributed tool, committing changes is decoupled from > sharing them. > > As you surmise, you can agree to use a central repository with a > distributed tool, but it's a matter of preference and convention, not > something forced upon you by the tool designers. > > > <b > _______________________________________________ > CMake mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake > -- Mike Jackson imikejackson _at_ gee-mail dot com _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
