Am Samstag 05 April 2008 07:07:14 schrieb Kelly (KT) Thompson: > I guess there are too many combinations to make everything work and I > understand that IVF+MSVC is a lower priority for the CMake dev/testing > team. Maybe I'll dig into the workings of CMake one of these > weekends...
Cool > As a side note, I have also been trying to get g95 (www.g95.org) to > configure with NMake Makefiles (Visual C++ 2009 Express Edition). > CMake is able to identify and use the Fortran compiler, but it gets > the link flags wrong when creating an executable. Do you know of > anyone using g95 with nmake? I would assume that this configuration > might be popular since both products are free for non-commercial use. It's GPLed, thus free for commercial use too. Usually I work with mingw32-make just because it's much faster than nmake in conjunction with the way how cmake operates the module dependencies. I never used g95. but gfortran hp: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran installer: http://quatramaran.ens.fr/~coudert/gfortran/gfortran-windows.exe I don't remember of using nmake for this one, but it should work. However, if g95 doesn't work with cmake-2.6, please do a bug report. I'll give g95 a try if I find time. -- Maik _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
