On Jul 20, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:16 AM, John Drescher
<dresche...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Robert Dailey<rcdai...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for the response Bill.
> I guess I could always use CodeBlocks & MinGW.
> Sincerely,
> Robert Dailey
>
How about a single source folder that is shared between two binary out
of source builds. One for Visual Studio and the second for CodeBlocks
/ Mingw?
Great idea, but I don't think I like Visual Studio that much lol. It
would be a lot of switching back and forth. CodeBlocks isn't that
bad of an IDE anyway (Assuming you don't have to write the Makefiles
yourself, which I don't), so I don't mind using it as an alternative.
2 other IDEs that I have used on Windows with various amounts of
success are:
Eclipse CDT (using MinGW and MSYS Makefiles)
QtCreator (through the use of CodeBlocks project files)
Just some food for thought if CodeBlocks does not "flip your fancy"
---
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
