Yep, Makefile based project. the project originally came with a Makefile that didnt do incremental builds, which was driving me nuts, so I figured I would replace that Makefile with one created by CMake. I just overwrote the original Makefile with one produced by CMake.
In your example below, my build directory is 'MMP' rather than 'Build', but otherwise the same. please see this image: http://help.eclipse.org/galileo/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.cdt.doc.user/reference/cdt_u_prop_build_settings_steps.htm - My builder type is 'external builder' and I dont have the option of changing that, presumably since it is a makefile project. - I have default build command unticked - my build command is simply - 'make' - I have generate makefiles automatically unticked. - my build location build directory is ${workspace_loc:/mdc/MMP} The build still fails in the same way whether I include the build location in the actual 'build command' string or not (presumably it is set by the build location paramter at the bottom) thanks Steve ----- Original Message ---- > From: Mike Jackson <mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> > To: Steve Mathers <stevenmath...@yahoo.com> > Cc: cmake@cmake.org > Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 11:33:56 AM > Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake Digest, Vol 64, Issue 50 > > Couple more questions just to be clear. > > Did you choose to build a "Makefile" based Eclipse project when you > created your project? If you just selected a "C++" project then > eclipse is trying to create its own makefiles for your project. > > Are you using an "out of source build" for your project? For example, > do you have a "Build" directory within your project directory? Let's > say for example that you have created a "Build" directory inside your > project directory, then if you right click on the project in the C++ > Projects view, and select properties. Then Select "Build", there is an > option to use the built in "make" or select your own command. Make > what ever selection is necessary to enable the use of your own "make > command". That command should be: > > make -C ${workspace_loc}/mdc/Build VERBOSE=1 > > Then you can manually invoke the build for your project and see what happens. > > _________________________________________________________ > Mike Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net > BlueQuartz Software www.bluequartz.net > Principal Software Engineer Dayton, Ohio > > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Steve Matherswrote: > > Hi Michael. that option is what I am already doing, which is why I am > confused. 'make' from the terminal works great, 'make' from eclipse craps > out. > > > > I tried running eclipse from the terminal, and it didnt help. > > > > I noticed something else strange > > > > here is the output from eclipse once I have done a make from the terminal, > then done a build in eclipse (essentially nothing to do, so eclipse doesnt > bomb) > > > > > > **** Build of configuration Linux GCC for project mdc **** > > > > make VERBOSE=1 -d > > GNU Make 3.81 > > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > > PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > > > This program built for i686-redhat-linux-gnu > > Reading makefiles... > > Reading makefile `Makefile'... > > Updating makefiles.... > > Considering target file `Makefile'. > > Looking for an implicit rule for `Makefile'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `Makefile,v'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `RCS/Makefile,v'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `RCS/Makefile'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `s.Makefile'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `SCCS/s.Makefile'. > > No implicit rule found for `Makefile'. > > Finished prerequisites of target file `Makefile'. > > No need to remake target `Makefile'. > > Updating goal targets.... > > > > etc.... > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > NOW, here is the output having modfiied foo so that it needs to be rebuilt. > (one run) > > > > > > > > **** Build of configuration Linux GCC for project mdc **** > > > > make VERBOSE=1 -d > > GNU Make 3.81 > > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > > PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > > > This program built for i686-redhat-linux-gnu > > Reading makefiles... > > Reading makefile `Makefile'... > > Updating makefiles.... > > Considering target file `Makefile'. > > Looking for an implicit rule for `Makefile'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `Makefile,v'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `RCS/Makefile,v'. > > make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/appmonitor.dir/AppMonitor/foo.cpp.o] Error 1 > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `RCS/Makefile'. > > make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/appmonitor.dir/all] Error 2 > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `s.Makefile'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `SCCS/s.Makefile'. > > No implicit rule found for `Makefile'. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > and here is the output of a second run... > > > > notice how the errors are reported in different stages... is that because > there is some kind of concurrnecy thing going on with the build or what? Is > it > important? I have no clue about this, but it seems to me that eclipse is > alomst > trying to compete with the makefile if that makes sense? I dont know... > > > > **** Build of configuration Linux GCC for project mdc **** > > > > make VERBOSE=1 -d > > GNU Make 3.81 > > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > > make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/appmonitor.dir/AppMonitor/foo.cpp.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/appmonitor.dir/all] Error 2 > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > > > This program built for i686-redhat-linux-gnu > > Reading makefiles... > > Reading makefile `Makefile'... > > Updating makefiles.... > > Considering target file `Makefile'. > > Looking for an implicit rule for `Makefile'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `Makefile,v'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `RCS/Makefile,v'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > Trying implicit prerequisite `RCS/Makefile'. > > Trying pattern rule with stem `Makefile'. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > >> Message: 4 > >> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:56:35 -0400 > >> From: Michael Jackson > >> Subject: Re: [CMake] eclipse-cmake bug - more info > >> To: Cmake Mailing List > >> Message-ID: <418516b5-1a33-4599-93b9-8752fc2da...@bluequartz.net> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > >> > >> Another similar approach to try and diagnose the problem would be to > >> have CMake generate plain Makefiles > >> > >> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Eclipse_UNIX_Tutorial > >> > >> Use "Option 2" from that tutorial. > >> > >> You should be able to build your project from the terminal with > >> "Make" and from Eclipse. Both should give you the same results. > >> > >> Also, something I have noticed is that I have to launch Eclipse > >> _from the terminal_ in order to get my environment correct. If I click > >> on the Eclipse icon in the Linux GUI (KUbuntu) then I have noticed > >> that Eclipse can not find somethings. odd. > >> > >> Just another thought. > >> _________________________________________________________ > >> Mike Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________________ > > Find local businesses and services in your area with Yahoo!7 Local. > > Get started: http://local.yahoo.com.au > > _______________________________________________ > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake > > __________________________________________________________________________________ Find local businesses and services in your area with Yahoo!7 Local. Get started: http://local.yahoo.com.au _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
