On Sunday 20 September 2009, Harald Kipp wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 20 September 2009, Harald Kipp wrote: > >> My subdir CMakeLists: > >> > >> --- C:\ethernut-4.9.6\nut\fs\CMakeLists.txt --- > >> add_library(nutfs STATIC basename dirent dirname) > > > > This command means that you want to build a library called "nutfs" from > > the source files "basename", "dirent" and "dirname". Is this what you > > want ? > > Yes. Actually there are more files, but I wanted to start with these > simple ones first.
I would recommend to use the full filename, i.e. including the suffix. So probably basename.c etc. > The directory structure is > > C:\ethernut-4.9.6 > nut <- Source tree > fs <- nutlibfs sources > .... <- other sources > > >> cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" > >> -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=c:\ethernut-4.9.6\toolchain-generic.cmake > >> c:\ethernut-4.9.6\nut > >> > >> So far the result is > >> > >> -- Configuring done > >> -- Generating done > >> -- Build files have been written to: C:/ethernut-4.9.6/nutbld > >> > >> However, when trying to run make, I get > > > > What "make" is it ? cygwin ? mingw ? > > Generally we use > http://www.yagarto.de/ > for building arm-elf binaries on Windows. YAGARTO is build with mingw. > However, the Ethernut developers do not need to install cygwin or mingw. > So far all binaries run on a native Windows command shell. I'm not completely sure here. I think if you generate "Unix Makefiles" on Windows you may need to execute it from a mingw shell or something like this. But I'm not sure. > >> Scanning dependencies of target nutfs > >> [ 33%] Building C object fs/CMakeFiles/nutfs.dir/basename.c.obj > >> Das System kann den angegebenen Pfad nicht finden. > > > > Try "VERBOSE=1 make" to see the full command which is executed. > > I'll try to do this tommorrow. > > >> cd C:/ethernut-4.9.6/nutbld && "C:/Programm.... > >> > >> I think that this will not work on Windows. cd requires backslashes. > > > > I think this depends on the type of makefiles you generate and on the > > type of make/shell you use to execute them. > > You might try the nmake makefiles in case you have nmake. > > I'll try this as well. > > One reason for looking at CMake as an alternative to GNU autotools is, > that we do not want to force Windows users to install Cygwin or force OS > X users to install fink. It'd be great if CMake can help here. Should do. Alex _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
