On 19. Nov, 2009, at 3:07 , David Manura wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday 18 November 2009, David Manura wrote:
That would be better than nothing, though it does have a
limitation in
that you cannot wrap a function more than once.
Not sure. Have you tried ?
function(test)
message("1")
endfunction(test)
test()
function(test)
message("2")
_test()
endfunction(test)
test() # ok
function(test)
message("3")
_test()
endfunction(test)
test() # infinite loop
Michael's suggestion would help too, though it might be called a hack.
The expressiveness of the language could be improved if we could
allow symbols in the function namespace to be copied or renamed:
set(&test3 &test) # bind function symbol "test3" to value of
function symbol "test"
function(test)
message("3")
test3()
endfunction(test)
Not sure I'd like that... Instead of being more expressive, I think
this would be very confusing.
Michael
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
