Indeed, it is much more sophisticated, so it may be more bugged ;-) >> shell i send you my scripts to take a look? It's not necessary. I have downloaded the refactoring branch of yars. Thanks.
I comment my OCaml scripts and I send you, so that you could also have a look. I have took a look at your UseOCaml script. I can't see why you copy ML files into the current binary dir before compiling them. Is there a reason ? Keep in touch, J. Bedouet On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Keyan <m...@pulsschlag.net> wrote: > I totally agree. > > Judicaël: how should we proceed? my first impression is that your > usecaml.cmake is much more sophisticated then mine :) same for the > findocaml.cmake scripts, as mine up to now does nothing more than to call a > bunch of find_program commands. > > shell i send you my scripts to take a look? > > i have no problem with merging my stuff into your scripts, keeping you as > main author, if there is anything useful for you. > > cheers, > keyan > > > On 15 Jan 2010, at 02:39, Philip Lowman wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Keyan <m...@pulsschlag.net> wrote: > >> hi, > >> > >> ups ... i thought i replied to the list. thanks for the link. i will > adapt my find-script to the requirements and maintain the package. > > > > You should work with Judicaël to combine the best of both of your > > works together into one FindOCaml and UseOCaml script. There is no > > sense having two of them out there. > > > > -- > > Philip Lowman > > >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake