On 07/13/2010 07:34 AM, Verweij, Arjen wrote: > Sent Brad source code to reproduce the bahaviour. [snip] > I have figured out that the time spent is not lost in > cmake_copy_f90_mod, but in a make directive right before: > > /usr1/people/maddev/util/bin/make -f CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/build.make > CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/exec.f90.o.provides.build > > So the make is slow, but the cmake_copy_f90_mod and the touch are fast.
The example is very zippy for me, but I had to change to using a different compiler because I do not have pgf90 installed. I tried both GNU on Linux and XL on AIX. I wonder if cmake_copy_f90_mod has trouble with the pgf90 module files. We do have tests running nightly for that platform, but they would not reveal a delay if the result is correct. The log you sent is inconclusive. I do not think the lines are appearing in the order they are produced. The make invocation you mention above *is* executing cmake_copy_f90_mod. After running the initial make to build the first time, edit the file "CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/depend.make". There should be a block like this: CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/execute.mod.proxy: CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/exec.f90.o.provides CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/exec.f90.o.provides.build: $(CMAKE_COMMAND) -E cmake_copy_f90_mod inc/mod/execute CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/execute.mod.stamp GNU $(CMAKE_COMMAND) -E touch CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/exec.f90.o.provides.build CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/build: CMakeFiles/mytest.dir/exec.f90.o.provides.build Add an "echo" before and after the cmake_copy_f90_mod line to confirm whether the delay is there or not. Thanks, -Brad _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake