On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Michael Jackson <mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote: >> Is there a problem with multiple configures / build trees? > > No, which is what is done now, just at a "higher" level than you are > wanting. You would like to have Win32 and Win64 in the same solution file > which would require multiple configure runs in the same build directory. > Currently CMake requires the developer to create 2 distinct build trees, one > for Win32 and one for Win64 where each build directory is configured with > the appropriate compiler version. So same idea just implemented slightly > differently.
I understand. The developer shouldn't have to do this. > It may not be a priority for _you_ but it is a requirement for me. The > code snippet that David C. put in there is extremely important to get right > and the ONLY way to get it right is to run configure multiple times for each > Arch. Just have a look at any project that attempts to support Universal > Binaries on OS X. The same problem exists. One has to make sure that the > sizes of pointers and some primitives are correct so header file generation > is correct. I'm not saying it shouldn't be solved. ;) Olaf _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
