On Jul 27, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Verweij, Arjen wrote:
Hi,
Isn't build_type = Release sufficient?
Not for the way I'm mistreating cmake ;)
set (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE RELEASE FORCE)
SET (CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS_INIT "" FORCE)
set (CMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE_INIT "")
set (CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE_INIT "")
set (CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE_INIT "")
Also I have to add -nodefaultlib:msvcrt.lib (I want libcmt) and if I
add a list of libs to exclude (-nodefaultlib:xxx.lib -
nodefaultlib:yyy.lib -nodefaultlib:zzz) the last one can't have
the .lib extension because I get it twice. (zzz.lib.lib if you don't
omit the extension yourself. Perhaps a bug, but I don't have time to
investigate right-now.
Arjen
Could you help me understand the motivations behind this type of code?
Is it the conflicts between the debug and release C/C++ runtime
libraries on Visual Studio?
___________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer mike.jack...@bluequartz.net
BlueQuartz Software Dayton, Ohio
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
