On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Michael Hertling <mhertl...@online.de>wrote:
> ...which shows that 10718 is still alive. ;-) > > Hi Philip, > > what's your opinion on this topic, in particular > > - swapping loops and the required effort, the related risks > and the expected results, > I'd like to know if there is a use case for the existing behavior. I don't really have an opinion if this should be enabled optionally or by default (or via policy) yet. > - find modules with hardcoded magic numbers and the continuous > need for maintenance, > - globbing or regex support for FIND_{PROGRAM,LIBRARY,PATH,FILE}? > > I've griped about this for a while. So much that I even started working on a patch for the issue back when I had some free time last year (but never finished). What little time I have these days to spend on CMake I choose to spend on supporting find modules, so if anyone wants to take this over... It was one approach for how to solve the version number problem... http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8396 -- Philip Lowman
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake