On 21 December 2010 16:41, Clinton Stimpson <clin...@elemtech.com> wrote: > Would you prefer having a set of variables that point to the dlls, or would > you rather have a function that takes a list of Qt modules and copies the > necessary plugins for those Qt modules to a certain location? > It seems the latter is more desirable, and probably doesn't depend on the > former. If the latter, should it also do a qt.conf file as well?
I think both would be useful. The latter could be in a BundleUtilities equivalent specialised for Qt applications (something I'd love to help develop) and is basically what macdeployqt does. I think it would be good to be able to be pretty automated (e.g. plugins for each modules) but there's also a good use-case for providing full plugin paths through the FindQt4.cmake module, in my opinion. You could just add a mapping on top of that of what plugins "belong" to what modules. -- Mike McQuaid http://mikemcquaid.com _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
