On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 06:53:23 PM cheshirekow wrote:
> Hi cmake list,
> 
> I'm using cmake to manage a CUDA project, and I'm generating an eclipse
> project for development.
> 
> Since CDT doesn't natively understand the output from the nvidia
> compiler, I've created a new regex error parser (I'm using eclipse 3.7
> but I heard 3.6 has this ability as well), however, in the project
> generated by cmake, I cannot add this error parser. It does not appear
> in the list of check boxes. I'm trying to figure out why.
> 
> I've tried creating a new C/C++ makefile project, and my custom error
> parser does appear in there. I compared the .project and .cproject files
> from both the cmake generated project and the dummy makefile project
> from the CDT new project wizard. They look very different. In addition,
> when I look at the project properties dialog for the cmake generated
> project, the options available are different then one from an eclipse
> wizard generated project. They are:
> 
> C/C++ General
> C/C++ Include Paths and Symbols
> C/C++ Make Project
> C/C++ Project Paths
> 
> Whereas, when using the new project wizard from CDT I get
> 
> C/C++ Build
> C/C++ General
> 
> In the cmake generated project, error parsers are listed under C/C++
> Make Project. In the eclipse generated project, error parsers are listed
> under C/C++ Build->settings.
> 
> Does anyone understand why the cmake generated project is different from
> the eclipse generated project? Is it because cmake is generating project
> files for an older version of CDT? Is there a way to make it the same
> and use my custom parser?

Please create an entry in the cmake bug tracker for this: 
http://public.kitware.com/Bug

Thanks
Alex
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to