On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:59 +0100, Eric Noulard wrote: > I think this one is acceptable since it may be considered a bug > (you may open one exactly for that purpose) > to use summary when you expect full 'description'. > > The then almost backward compatible algorithm would be: > > 1) use CPACK_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION if it is defined > 2) if not use CPACK_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION_FILE if it is defined > 3) if not use CPACK_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION_SUMMARY > > I bet that most people that do use CPACK_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION_[FILE] > won't mind having it replace the CPACK_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION_SUMMARY > in deb package description. > > Those not using the previous will keep their current > CPACK_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION_SUMMARY usage.
Okay, I'll look into this. Erik -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
