On 21 December 2011 18:10, Renato Utsch <renatout...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, exactly, the way it is now is not obvious, but it should be. > > I indeed thought that CMake 2.8 documentation was for 2.8.*, but I > discovered this week that it wasn't. And I'm sure that this happens > with A LOT of people.
As a matter of fact, it happened to me several times until I've learned the lesson. "Manual version vs CMake version" http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-February/035006.html IMHO, the choice is binary: either docs are versioned (see Python) or only docs for most recent release are displayed but titled with full version number X.Y.Z. Best regards -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
