On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Sean McBride <s...@rogue-research.com> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:54:23 +0100, Szilárd Páll said: > >>Additionally, IMHO it's quite unfortunate that such a widely used >>compiler as the Intel Compiler has such flaky support in CMake. > > Searching today's dashboard for "icc", I see only 1 entry: > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/index.php?project=CMake> > > I'm sure the community would benefit from additional submissions. icc costs > money, making it harder...
Sure, I understand that -- although Kitware isn't really a group of free-time OSS coders... Also, I wouldn't have even considered the poor Intel Compiler support unfortunate if I didn't think that CMake tends to compromise when it comes to robustness of implementations. It is no fun to have to test across all *patch versions* of CMake with dozens of configurations :) I could pitch in with running a few Dashboard submissions using Intel Compiler on Linux if that helps, but I doubt I can dedicate a machine for long-term contribution. Cheers, -- Szilárd > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com > Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com > Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada > > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
