On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Michael Wild <them...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 05:25 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Rolf Eike Beer <e...@sf-mail.de > > <mailto:e...@sf-mail.de>> wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 17. August 2012, 14:17:33 schrieb Michael Wild: > > > Yes, e.g. i386 works fine: > > > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=freefoam&arch=i386&ver=0.1.0% > > > 2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1345172639 > > > > > > It seems that only the more exotic (non-Intel) ones have this > issue. I > > > forgot to mention that mipsel and sparc have the same problem. > Except > > > for mipsel they are all big-endian... > > > > You are looking at the totally wrong place I guess ;) > > > > i386 command: > > > > cd > > > /build/buildd-freefoam_0.1.0+dfsg-1-i386-5n1wds/freefoam-0.1.0+dfsg/obj- > > i486-linux-gnu/src/Pstream/dummy && /usr/bin/g++ > > -DdummyPstream_EXPORTS -DDP > > -DNoRepository -Dlinux -g -O2 -fstack-protector > > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 - > > Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive - > > D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -I/build/buildd-freefoam_0.1.0+dfsg-1- > > i386-5n1wds/freefoam-0.1.0+dfsg/obj-i486-linux-gnu/include -o > > CMakeFiles/dummyPstream.dir/dummyIPstreamImpl.C.o -c /build/buildd- > > freefoam_0.1.0+dfsg-1- > > i386-5n1wds/freefoam-0.1.0+dfsg/src/Pstream/dummy/dummyIPstreamImpl.C > > > > powerpc build: > > > > cd > > > /build/buildd-freefoam_0.1.0+dfsg-1-powerpc-810bTJ/freefoam-0.1.0+dfsg/obj- > > powerpc-linux-gnu/src/Pstream/dummy && /usr/bin/g++ > > -DdummyPstream_EXPORTS - > > DDP -DNoRepository -g -O2 -fstack-protector > > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat > > -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive > > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 - > > fPIC -I/build/buildd-freefoam_0.1.0+dfsg-1- > > powerpc-810bTJ/freefoam-0.1.0+dfsg/obj-powerpc-linux-gnu/include > > -D -o > > CMakeFiles/dummyPstream.dir/dummyIPstreamImpl.C.o -c /build/buildd- > > freefoam_0.1.0+dfsg-1- > > > powerpc-810bTJ/freefoam-0.1.0+dfsg/src/Pstream/dummy/dummyIPstreamImpl.C > > > > The important difference is: > > > > the PowerPC build has a stray "-D" in it, so g++ takes the following > > -o as > > define and the following object file name as input instead of as > output. > > > > > > NICE EYE!!!!! > > How very embarrassing! Thanks for helping me out with this one. > > Just curious: was it a misspelled variable name? Would you have gotten a warning if you used "--warn-unused-vars" on the cmake command line?
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
