I see the advantages. I think I will do what you suggest for languages. As far as cascading, I see it both ways and I think I'll be more productive if I abandon the idea that there is a best practice for this. It isn't THAT hard to make it right either way. If you know your dependencies (e.g. HDF5) didn't do it you can always patch it up at a higher level in FindNetCDF or CMakeLists.txt. It is a surprising gap though since so much of how FindXXX is written is standarized.
-- View this message in context: http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Why-is-XXX-INCLUDE-DIRS-plural-and-should-it-be-deep-tp7582623p7582659.html Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
