Hi Eric, >> That is not a good format of rpm package name. Can we take control the >> component package name in 2.8.8?
> Not yet see: > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997 > Won't probably be in 2.8.9 either. > I know it will be useful for many of us, I just lack time to go through > it. > The work is not that difficult but it has many potential impact so that > we shall take time to do it carefully. Has the issue been resolved in 2.8.10? Thank you. Kind regards. Jupiter Eric Noulard wrote > 2012/6/27 hce < > jupiter.hce@ > >: >> Hi, >> >> I've read some discussions posted ten months ago on >> http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Component-Package-Name-td6976896.html >> where Eric Noulard pointed out that we could not control component >> package >> name for the reason of unique package name. I am currently running on >> 2.8.8 >> and generated very funny component package name: >> >> foo-1.1-1.0.el6.x86_64-FooComponent.rpm, it basically set by following >> format: >> >> ${CPACK_PACKAGE_NAME}-${CPACK_PACKAGE_VERSION}-${CPACK_SYSTEM_NAME}-${COMPONENT_NAME}.rpm >> >> That is not a good format of rpm package name. Can we take control the >> component package name in 2.8.8? > > Not yet see: > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997 > > Won't probably be in 2.8.9 either. > I know it will be useful for many of us, I just lack time to go through > it. > The work is not that difficult but it has many potential impact so that > we shall take time to do it carefully. > >> BTW, when I build two packages foo-1.1 and , the bin-1.2, the CPack >> generates an extra Unspecified package, theCPackConfig.cmake set: >> >> SET(CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL >> "foo-1.1-1.0.el6.x86_64;bin-1.2-1.el6.x86_6;Unspecified") >> >> Where the Unspecified come from and now can I fix it? > > As Micha said, this comes from an INSTALL statement which > does not contains COMPONENT. > see > http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake:Component_Install_With_CPack#Specificying_components_and_groups > > or this recent discussion: > http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2012-June/050855.html > > > -- > Erk > Le gouvernement représentatif n'est pas la démocratie -- > http://www.le-message.org > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- View this message in context: http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Can-we-control-component-package-name-in-2-8-8-tp7580641p7583465.html Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake