On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Michael Jackson <mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote: > > Because if you do this then OpenBlas is instantly supported by currently > released versions of CMake. If you are asking for an update to the core of > CMake then you are going to have to wait for the next release of CMake and > then ALL of your users are going to have to update their CMake installations. > This may or may NOT be possible on all those systems. Having used OpenBLAS > for a current project I would like to see the OpenBLAS developers step up and > set an example for the other projects and properly support CMake. Just my 2 > cents worth. >
This is moot argument - if OpenBLAS provides OpenBLASConfig.cmake, then its users have to update something (OpenBLAS in this case) anyway, in order to have OpenBLAS+CMake working properly together... So, again: as a CMake/OpenBLAS user, I really see no point in requiring something from OpenBLAS that none of dozen of currently supported BLAS implementations is doing. Thanks. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
