On 22-Dec-15 04:07, Magnus Therning wrote:
Ruslan Baratov writes:
On 20-Dec-15 01:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
Ruslan Baratov writes:
How about using RelWithDebInfo? See:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/28124715/2288008
Hmm, I'm probably missing something but how does that solve the issue
with some targets requiring NDEBUG to be *undefined* and other targets
requiring NDEBUG to be defined?
I don't think that building targets with different NDEBUG values is a
good idea. More correct approach will be to introduce custom macro to
allow checks (i.e. FOO_NDEBUG/FOO_DEBUG).
Why not?
It is possible to hit situation when ODR will be violated, e.g. if
somebody define optional member in structure with "#if defined(NDEBUG)"
condition. Something like this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20833226/library-headers-and-define
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of
life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be
enthusiastic about.
-- Albert Einstein
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
