On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 15:15:58 -0500, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote: >> That's too bad. I understand the perspective of the Ninja developers, >> but it's not clear to me what the proposed alternative should be. >> Should CMake be using the subninja[1] keyword to include the >> build.ninja of External Projects? > > That would be possible with the work that's been done here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/15364
Awesome. Nothing left to be said in this thread. I'll start following that one. Taylor -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
