On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 15:15:58 -0500, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote:
>> That's too bad. I understand the perspective of the Ninja developers,
>> but it's not clear to me what the proposed alternative should be.
>> Should CMake be using the subninja[1] keyword to include the
>> build.ninja of External Projects?
>
> That would be possible with the work that's been done here:
>
>     http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/15364

Awesome. Nothing left to be said in this thread. I'll start following that one.

Taylor
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to