On Tue, 10 May 2016 11:39:49 +0200
Attila Krasznahorkay <attila.krasznahor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
> 
> I *think* that these public/private rules behave a bit differently
> for static libraries than they do for shared ones.
> 
> But I have to admit, that based on this code I also would've guessed
> that -I/tmp would not show up in the build of exe1...
> 
> I did manage to use public and private dependencies as expected in my
> own configurations, so I'm not exactly sure what's going wrong in
> your case. Which version of CMake did you use for the test?

I'm using cmake 3.5.0.

Thank you for your feedback - I'll try to use shared-libraries, to see
whether it changes something or not

regards,
--
Patrick.
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to