On 22 March 2018 at 16:51, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote: > On 03/22/2018 10:17 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> It seems folks generally agree there is need for porcelain API. >> It's a pity it's been 5+ years and it is still waiting for implementation. > > [...] > The main driving factor was compatibility with existing projects > using `target_link_libraries` at the time.
I could have an argument to that... > In the end it was decided that the extra command would be redundant and > we proceeded with `tll()` only. I'd prefer not to have this debated > endlessly again. ...but I won't and I'll shut up then. Thank you for chiming in with the extra details. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
