I often hit this, particularly with header-only INTERFACE libraries where I 
just want to pick up their defines/include paths, and then CMake ends up 
treating the target_link_libraries(PRIVATE as public anyway). So it would 
definitely be helpful to have a warning that this doesn’t do what you’d expect, 
and maybe a pointer to $<BUILD_INTERFACE:header_library> which seems to be the 
only way to actually have a private (not listed in the exported 
<project-config.cmake> dependency while building a static library.

From: CMake [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Marc CHEVRIER
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 8:54 AM
To: Cmake Mailing List <cmake@cmake.org>; Andrew Bell <andrew.bell...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CMake] Static Libraries and target_link_libraries

It is quite inexact because a target can store many information like include 
directories or preprocessor definitions for example (through properties like 
INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES or COMPILE_DEFINITIONS).

So it make sense to enable to specify link libraries to a static library using 
PRIVATE or PUBLIC to ensure various settings are propagated to the static 
library compilation step.
Le 25 janv. 2019 à 15:46 +0100, Andrew Bell 
<andrew.bell...@gmail.com<mailto:andrew.bell...@gmail.com>>, a écrit :


When creating a static library, you can still use the function 
"target_link_libraries" even though the static library is never linked, as 
such.  What you're doing is creating a dependency record for cmake so that 
target_link_libraries of a static library are included in a link of some other 
target which depends on the static library.  What seems confusing is that 
target_link_libraries accepts the keywords PUBLIC and PRIVATE as well as 
INTERFACE when used with a static library, since only INTERFACE really makes 
sense in this context.

Would it be beneficial to issue a warning when someone uses PUBLIC or PRIVATE 
with target_link_libraries on a static library to make it clear that they may 
not be understanding what's going on?

--
Andrew Bell
andrew.bell...@gmail.com<mailto:andrew.bell...@gmail.com>
--

Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com>

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to