Hi,
Thanks for the information on gsl wavelet. Viewing the graph, then, is
probably a better method of evaluating the results of the transform. I'll need
to figure out how to put the gsl data into the 'f' graph window. I haven't
been able to code that yet.
Jim
________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on
behalf of [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 9:00 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Cmdist Digest, Vol 205, Issue 2
Send Cmdist mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Cmdist digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: gsl wavelet ([email protected])
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 13:07:01 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: James Hearon <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [CM] gsl wavelet
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
I think *wavelet-type* 0 is daub4, 1 is daub6.
The graphs look similar to me, but gsl's
dwt algorithm is slightly different from Snd's.
I don't remember much about this (Snd's code
was written in 1999, I think, so gsl's is probably
more up-to-date).
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
[email protected]
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
End of Cmdist Digest, Vol 205, Issue 2
**************************************
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
[email protected]
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
