On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:41:09 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Hendrik Boom scripsit: >> I have a not-quite-complete Algol 68 conmpiler, > > Excellent! 68 Classic, 68R, or 68S?
Algol 68, as defined by the Revised Report, but without formats. Possibly implementing the Bekic proposal (stack on the heap, no scope checking) -- but this depends on the constraints the back end places on me. -- hendrik > >> Opinions, please. Potential users, please speak up. Potential >> contributors, likewise. > > I'd go with LLVM, given the better support today. It's not an easy decision. LLVM is very C-ish, and makes procedure environments and goto's out of procedures rather awkward. -- hendrik -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Cminusminus mailing list [email protected] https://cminusminus.org/mailman/listinfo/cminusminus
