Ok, but not all the unmatched records are going to have "/contr" in them. So on that secondary output I need a locate to select the ones that do have it, then a change to delete the "/contr" and then finally send them to the faninany preceding the lookup. When I do that with copy or elastic, the pipe stalls. Ideas? -- bc
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Schuh, Richard<rsc...@visa.com> wrote: > Your secondary output of lookup would go through the stream where "Modify the > record" is. Only unmatched details pass through it. > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List >> [mailto:cms-pipeli...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Cronin >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:07 AM >> To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU >> Subject: Re: Re-lookup? >> >> I only want to lookup the modified version if the un-modified >> version is not found (but thanks for that idea Rob). >> >> The faninany/copy was what I was looking for, thanks to both of you. >> -- >> bc >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Schuh, Richard<rsc...@visa.com> wrote: >> > Faninany in the primary input - you will need a stage to >> consume the record prior to sending it to the faninany. Copy >> or elastic should do the job. >> > >> > ... | f: faninany |l: lookup ... \ l: | ... Modify the >> record | copy | f: >> > >> > Regards, >> > Richard Schuh >> > >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List >> >> [mailto:cms-pipeli...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Cronin >> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:27 AM >> >> To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU >> >> Subject: Re: Re-lookup? >> >> >> >> But I don't want it in the reference, I want it in the >> details. The >> >> reference contains a table of known-valid Notes email >> addresses and >> >> their rfc822 equivalent and the details contains a table of Notes >> >> addresses I am trying to determine the rfc822 equivalent for. If I >> >> don't find a candidate address in the reference, I want to >> see if it >> >> has a "/Contr/" >> >> in it, remove it if so and re-look-it-up in the known-valid table. >> >> >> >> What am I missing here? >> >> -- >> >> bc >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Schuh, >> Richard<rsc...@visa.com> wrote: >> >> > Feed them in to the tertiary input stream. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Tertiary Input Stream: When a record is read on the >> >> tertiary input >> >> > stream, >> >> > the contents of the second input range are used as the >> >> key. The >> >> > record is >> >> > added to the reference if there is not already a record in the >> >> > reference for >> >> > the key. The record is also added if ALLMASTERS is specified. >> >> > Otherwise the >> >> > record is a duplicate and it is passed to the quinary >> >> output stream >> >> > (if it is >> >> > defined and connected). >> >> > >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Richard Schuh >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> >> From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List >> >> >> [mailto:cms-pipeli...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Cronin >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:19 AM >> >> >> To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU >> >> >> Subject: Re-lookup? >> >> >> >> >> >> Is there a way to take detail records that were not >> found in the >> >> >> reference, modify them and then feed them back into the >> >> same lookup? >> >> >> >> >> >> For example let's say I am looking up an email address >> >> >> "Bob_Cronin/Contr/Poughkeepsie/IBM" and don't find it in the >> >> >> reference, can I >> on-the-fly-without-having-to-code-another-lookup >> >> >> take that non-matching record, modify it to >> >> >> "Bob_Cronin/Poughkeepsie/IBM" >> >> >> and look it up again? >> >> >> >> >> >> There seem to be lots of documented options for adding >> >> records to the >> >> >> reference on the fly, but not to the details. >> >> >> >> >> >> Am I just being silly here? >> >> >> -- >> >> >> bc >> >> >> >> >> >>
