So an At wouldn't be a problem then, yes? So the question is what to do with a relative, no? On 9 Apr 2016 21:17, "John P. Hartmann" <jphartm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As it is now, DELAY computes the TOD clock value at the time the event > is to occur based on the time zone and local time when DELAY started (if > not first time diag 0 is issued, I forget). After that computation, the > time is a value for the clock comparator and not in any way encumbered. > > On 04/09/2016 09:06 PM, Rod Furey wrote: > >> General question: what happens if you say "at 01:59 do this" then at 02:00 >> the clock goes back to 01:00? >> >>
